靶向治疗使复发的BRAF突变型脑瘤迅速萎缩

由马萨诸塞州综合医院(MGH)调查员领导的一个团队报告了首次成功使用一种靶向治疗药物来治疗一个衰弱的复发性脑肿瘤患者。在《国家癌症研究所杂志》在线发表的一篇论文中,研究人员报告说,用BRAF抑制剂 达拉菲尼 治疗促使了一个BRAF突变型颅咽管瘤的缩小,该瘤甚至在四次手术后复发。在达拉菲尼治疗一年多后,再进行手术和放疗,患者的肿瘤没有复发。 JNCI报告的共同作者、MGH癌症中心的Priscilla Brastianos博士说:”这是第一次显示出一种系统疗法对这种类型的肿瘤有疗效。”这有可能完全改变乳头状颅咽管瘤的管理,它可能给患者带来终身问题–包括视觉缺陷、智力受损、垂体和其他荷尔蒙功能紊乱。” 颅咽管瘤是垂体肿瘤,虽然在技术上是良性的,但由于其位置靠近关键结构,如视神经和其他颅神经以及下丘脑,因此会造成严重问题。生长中的肿瘤不仅会因撞击这些结构而损害神经和激素功能,而且通过手术切除或放射治疗也会因损害邻近组织而产生同样的症状。此外,由于肿瘤可以粘附在附近的大脑和血管结构上,因此很难完全切除,导致常常迅速复发。 JNCI论文中描述的病人在另一个国家接受脑瘤手术治疗7个月后,因意识模糊、视力受损、严重头痛和呕吐来到MGH急诊科。CT扫描显示,一个4厘米的囊性肿瘤–肿瘤被包裹在一个充满液体的囊中–压迫着中脑结构,阻碍了脑脊液的排出。虽然他的症状在手术切除部分肿瘤后有所改善,但并没有消失;六周后他回到了MGH,这次几乎处于昏迷状态。 MGH的神经外科医生再次切除了肿瘤,并证实这是一个BRAF突变的颅咽管瘤。但两周后,在计划的放射治疗进行之前,他的病情再次恶化,进入最小反应状态,导致第四次紧急手术。七周后,他又回到了医院,视力逐渐下降,核磁共振成像显示肿瘤再次复发。由于这个肿瘤的生长可能是由BRAF突变驱动的,而BRAF突变是众所周知的驱动黑色素瘤和其他恶性肿瘤生长的因素,该团队决定尝试用达拉非尼进行治疗,达拉非尼被FDA批准用于治疗BRAF突变的黑色素瘤。 仅仅经过四天的治疗,患者的肿瘤就缩小了约25%;而到了第17天,肿瘤的大小只有治疗前的一半,周围的囊肿也缩小了70%。第21天,治疗小组在方案中加入了MEK抑制剂曲美替尼,众所周知,曲美替尼能增强BRAF抑制的效果;到第35天,肿瘤和囊肿的大小都比治疗前减少了80%以上。第38天进行了内窥镜手术,切除了可触及的肿瘤,一周后停止了药物治疗,不久又进行了放射治疗。在写这篇论文时,该患者已经连续7个月没有症状,并且在最后一次治疗一年多后继续保持。 除了在切除的肿瘤组织中发现达拉菲尼抗肿瘤作用的证据外,研究人员还惊讶地发现,在患者治疗过程中多次采集的血液样本中存在BRAF突变。”JNCI论文的共同第一作者、MGH神经外科的William Curry, Jr.医生说:”这一结果绝对是新颖的。”在血液中发现BRAF突变的证据,提高了潜在诊断这种突变的希望,也许在手术前用靶向治疗缩小这些肿瘤,这可能使手术切除更安全,对一些病人来说可能不需要”。他还指出,由于颅咽管瘤在分子上没有恶性肿瘤那么复杂,它们可能不太可能对BRAF抑制产生抗性,这个问题一直困扰着几种类型癌症的靶向治疗。 JNCI论文的共同第一作者、布莱根妇女医院病理科的Sandro Santagata博士补充说:”我们能够从确定乳头状颅咽管瘤的遗传驱动因素到在需要帮助的病人身上测试这一想法,这相当了不起。就在去年,我们与Brastianos博士及其同事一起,在《自然-遗传学》上首次描述了几乎所有的乳头状颅咽管瘤都有BRAF的突变。这与许多黑色素瘤中发现的突变相同,使我们能够使用在黑色素瘤患者中大有可为的治疗策略”。 本文来源于互联网,如有侵权请联系删除。来源:medicalxpress.com/news/2015-11-treatment-rapid-shrinkage-recurrent-braf-mutant.html

Pembrolizumab With Dabrafenib and Trametinib Shows Efficacy, But High TRAEs, in Melanoma

The combination of pembrolizumab plus dabrafenib and trametinib as first-line treatment for BRAF-mutated melanomashowed antitumor activity, but high rates of grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events, according to results from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-022 trial presented at the ESMO 2018 Congress in Munich, Germany.1 The combination of pembrolizumab plus the BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib showed promising antitumor activity in the phase 1 portion of the KEYNOTE-022 trial. This report was of the results from the phase 2 portion. The double-blind, phase 2 KEYNOTE-022 trial randomly assigned 120 patients with treatment-naïve stage III or IV melanoma harboring a BRAFV600E/Kmutation to receive pembrolizumab plus dabrafenib and trametinib or placebo plus dabrafenib and trametinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), time to response, and overall survival (OS). The ORR was 63% with pembrolizumab plus dabrafenib and trametinib compared with 72% with the BRAF inhibitors alone, with complete response rates of 18% and 13%, respectively. The median time to response was similar between arms at 2.8 months. During a median follow-up of 9.6 months, there was a trend toward prolonged PFS with the pembrolizumab combination, but it was not significant based on prespecified parameters that required a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.62 or less. The median PFS with the pembrolizumab combination was 16 months (95% CI, 8.6-21.5 months) compared with 10.3 months (95% CI, 7.0-15.6 months) with dabrafenib plus trametinib alone, resulting in an HR of 0.66 (P = .043). The 12-month PFS was 59% and 45% with the pembrolizumab combination or the BRAF inhibitors alone, respectively. The median DoR was longer with the pembrolizumab combination at 18.7 months (range, 1.9+ to 22.1 months) compared with 12.5 months (range, 2.1-19.5+ months) with dabrafenib plus trametinib. Responses lasting at least 18 months was more common with pembrolizumab, occurring in 60% of patients compared with 28% of patients receiving only the BRAF inhibitors. The 12-month OS was 80% with the pembrolizumab combination compared with 73% with dabrafenib plus trametinib. There were similar rates of any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with 95% and 93% reported in the pembrolizumab combination and BRAF inhibitor only arms, respectively. Grade 3 to 5 TRAEs, however, occurred more frequently in the pembrolizumab combination arm at 58% compared with 27% in the dabrafenib plus trametinib arm. The discontinuation rate due to TRAEs was 40% and 20% in the pembrolizumab combination and dabrafenib plus trametinib arms, respectively. Common grade 3 to 5 TRAEs, which occurred in at least 5% of patients, included pyrexia, elevated ALT and/or AST, increased GGT, rash, and neutropenia. There was a death in the pembrolizumab arm caused by pneumonitis, which was deemed treatment-related. Immune-related AEs occurred in 43% of patients in the pembrolizumab group compared with 13% of patients in the BRAF inhibitor only group. The most common immune-related AEs were pneumonitis, hypothyroidism, skin disorders, hyperthyroidism, and uveitis. The authors concluded that the pembrolizumab combination “demonstrated numerically longer PFS and DoR and a higher rate of grade 3-5 TRAEs in patients with treatment-naïve BRAFV600E/K-mutant advanced melanoma.” Read more of Cancer Therapy Advisor's coverage of the ESMO 2018 meeting by visiting the conference page. Reference 1. Ascierto PA, Dummer R, et al. KEYNOTE-022 Part 3: Phase 2 randomized study of 1L dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) plus pembrolizumab (Pembro) or placebo (PBO) for BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. Presented at: ESMO 2018 Congress; Munich, Germany: October 19-23, 2018. Abstract 1244O. Article Source: https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/esmo-2018/melanoma-pembrolizumab-dabrafenib-trametinib-shows-efficacy-adverse-effect-risk/article/809104/

zh_CN简体中文